History of MembersPage/ReinisAndersons/Ecstasy
Older Newer
2008-08-11 22:23:33 . . . . MembersPage/MattiasSandgren [Accept low pulsewidth problems with these injectors]
2008-08-11 11:36:16 . . . . MembersPage/GergelyLezsak [strange VE guesses]
2008-08-02 00:18:18 . . . . 62.84.25.55 [reply about injector opening]
2008-08-02 00:16:20 . . . . 62.84.25.55 [reply about injector settings]
2008-08-01 16:44:03 . . . . MembersPage/GergelyLezsak [Injector control problem?]
2008-08-01 11:16:30 . . . . 87.246.139.166 [Updated wih log file]
2008-07-28 12:12:44 . . . . 87.246.139.166 [high low kpa VE bins]
2008-07-28 12:11:34 . . . . 87.246.139.166 [high low kpa VE bins]
2008-07-28 12:08:09 . . . . 87.246.139.166 [high low kpa VE bins]
2008-07-28 11:22:52 . . . . 87.246.139.166 [New project]


Changes by last author:

Added:
* These injectors are very difficult at short pulse-widths. Once you get to 1.5 ms (what you have at idle) they are not linear anymore, shorter pulsewidths can mean more fuel instead of less which makes the fuel calculation inaccurate. I'm not certain that this sloppiness is true for all "1600 cc/min" injectors, at least those that I've come across. $FlgChr1$FlgChr> I have determined that once you get above a volume per cylinder above 0.6 liters you have no real issues. The overall efficiency of the engine also plays a big role, cams, valves per cylinder and such things. $FlgChr2$FlgChr> In your case you are at 2.8/6=0.47 liters which is in the trouble zone, especially given that it is a modern efficient 4 valve/cyl engine. You have to accept some idle and low load problems with these injectors. I have seen some low-Z 1200 cc/min injectors with a different design that would be interesting to test, I'm pretty sure they would do better (www.racetronix.com). $FlgChr3$FlgChr> Regards / Mattias