Changes by last author:
Changed:
| 2006.01.28 - Removed D100 diode, which finally seemed like a ~8 Ohm resistor instead, and now it looks like everything is fine, car is running again. Is it possible that removing the diode affects inj. closing significantly? Running tests showed that VE-table isn't fit as good as it did before. |
|
2006.01.28
* Removed D100 diode, which finally seemed (you mean measured?) like a ~8 Ohm resistor instead, and now it looks like everything is fine, car is running again. * Is it possible that removing the diode affects inj. closing significantly? Running tests showed that VE-table (at low-MAP, right?) isn't fit as good as it did before. ** I guess injpw had to be increased by 0.1 .. 0.2 msec or so. This might need significant VE change at MAP=10..20kPa (especially with big injectors => low req_fuel ) because the multipliers are small. In this case, easier to add 100..200usec to injopen variable (which was 0 before, I guess!). But you can easily calculate the necessary adjustment to VE (eg. if your result is to add req_fuel/33, that is MAP*VE=300=100*100/33, than VE+=30 at MAP=10kPa, VE+=20 at MAP=15kPa,VE+=10 at MAP=30kPa, and so on). This likely makes your VE table more realistic. |