Changes by last author:
Added:
after a discussion on IRC a few guys agrees that we need to improve the testing of firmware and handle releases in a better way.
We have a documented release system in firmware_revision.h, which basically is split into three decimal numbers * Major version (currently 1) ** This is rarely incremented, requires a major rewrite and resign of code * Minor version (currently 0) ** This should be incremented as soon as a firmware update changes config variables and affects tuning software ** If this number is not incremented, a new version will work with older tuning program * Build version (currently 29ish) ** This is currently the only number increased, but should only be used for small updates that does not affect tuning part. Warning: This system does not affect 1.0.xx firmware For this system to work, I think we should assign a testing team and release executives, who can flag that a version is stable and ready for the users. This guy is preferrably not directly involved with programming, but of course cooperates on a close level. Any suggestions for test plan and possible candidates for a team leader / release executive are welcome on this page. ---- Possible candidates for the executive post * ... --- People willing to join the testing team, and devote some time to perform the future test plan for each release --- Test plan proposal |