###    
   ##    
   ##    
   ##    
   ##    
  ####   
         

         
  ###    
   ##    
   ##    
   ##    
   ##    
  ####   
         

  _   _ 
 | \ | |
 |  \| |
 | |\  |
 |_| \_|
        

______ 
| ___ \
| |_/ /
|    / 
| |\ \ 
\_| \_|
       
       

    ###  
     ##  
     ##  
  #####  
 ##  ##  
 ##  ##  
  ###### 
         

IMPORTANT: enter the case-INsensitive alphabetic (no numbers) code AND WRITE SOME SHORT summary of changes (below) if you are saving changes. (not required for previewing changes). Wiki-spamming is not tolerated, will be removed, so it does NOT even show up in history. Spammers go away now.


Visit Preferences to set your user name
Summary of change:
My plan is to make the RadioBoard to be real, look also I got Volvo Amazon with B20. ---- FuelCalc question: should TPS have anything to do with pulsewidth when using MAP based control? I have simulated V3 and noticed that TPS makes pw higher or lower while rest are the same. It should not, or should it? Example: (warmup=100%, ego=100% (off), barom=100%, accel=0, kPA=30) * TPS 0% => pw 1,7mS * TPS 11% => pw 2mS, this is the right calculated value! * TPS 45% => pw 2,6mS, more tps makes no difference, but with higher rpm tps up to 60% makes pw longer. "production" firmware, tried few different configs too Have you made sure that both hybrid_rpm settings = 00 ? Yes they are. Also noticed that with megatune 2.20, at tuning view (current) VE does not change but realtime view VE does change!
Optional: Add document to category:
Wiki formatting: * is Bullet list ** Bullet list subentry ... '''Bold''', ---- is horizontal ruler, <code> preformatted text... </code> See wiki editing HELP for tables and other formatting tips and tricks.